Share:
Tweet
  • Home
  • About the Book
  • Excerpts
  • Authors
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Buy the Book

The Missing Alphabet>

Home » Blog » Viewpoints: Part I

Viewpoints: Part I

April 8, 2015 | by Cynthia Herbert

ElephantI have long been intrigued by the Hindu tale of “The Blind Men and the Elephant.” In this story these wise men happen upon a new creature and each one touches a different part of the animal. Because of the differences, each has a theory about what an elephant might be. The one that touches the ear thinks the creature is a type of fan. The one that touches the trunk believes it to be a new kind of snake. The wise man that feels one of the strong, sturdy legs thinks that the elephant is a kind of tree. And so on. Each is partially correct but all are very wrong!

In the theory to practice education courses I used to teach, I would often begin with this tale to frame the scope of the course. A theory is a point of view, and, although most of us are sighted, we are still limited by our prejudices, expectations and experiences. In education, of course, we are not looking at an elephant, we are looking at a child and determining how best to teach that child. Every teacher, and parent, has a theory, a point of view, whether it is conscious or not.

Some theories are more limited than others. In one of his books, Howard Gardner discusses the limitations of three such theories. One limited theory is behaviorism, which sees a child as a vessel to be filled or as a piece of clay to be shaped as the adult chooses. This view ignores the incredible genetic endowments we have as a species and the incredible individual strengths to be found in each child. The result is a “one-size-fits-all” education with a set curriculum, standardized tests and instructional practices of reward and punishment.

Another limited theory is the one behind I.Q. testing—that assumes intelligence is a single thing, a “g,” to be measured. In this viewpoint some of us have a lot of “g,” some very little, and most of us are somewhere in the middle. The child is seen as a mostly unchanging I.Q. score who can be assigned to regular classes, gifted classes, or special education.  This view ignores the power that unforgettable learning experiences can have on a child’s growth and development.

The third view, pointed out by Gardner, is that the child is simply a miniature adult. If the child is no different than an adult, then there is no urgency for early childhood education and a child can be put to work in a sweatshop or selling on the streets. This view is limited because we know from Piaget and other pioneers that children are indeed different from adults, that they have stages of development and that there are critical periods that are more fertile for some kinds of learning.

A more comprehensive viewpoint is that of the constructivists, who believe that both “nature” and “nurture” matter and that a child learns through active interaction and construction of his world. This view has now been validated both by extensive longitudinal studies and emerging neuroscience. This places the child at the center of education and makes our adult understanding of children, childhood and early learning critical.

How about you? How do you see a child? What is your spoken or unspoken theory? What is the viewpoint that is overtly or covertly governing your style of parenting or teaching? It is important to know!

Filed Under: Uncategorized

« Previous Post
Next Post »

Innovative and practical... The Missing Alphabet is a thoughtful toolkit for creative thinkers of all ages. This is a vital resource for parents looking to nurture and sustain creative confidence in their children."  

– David M. Kelley
Founder, IDEO and the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University

Sign Up for Emails

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Blog Archives

  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (4)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (3)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (4)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (3)
  • September 2015 (5)
  • August 2015 (5)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (5)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (7)
  • February 2015 (7)
  • January 2015 (9)
  • December 2014 (6)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (4)
  • October 2013 (4)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (2)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • February 2013 (2)
  • January 2013 (6)
  • December 2012 (5)
  • November 2012 (9)
  • October 2012 (5)

Questions about The Missing Alphabet?

Ask the Authors

© 2012 The Missing Alphabet   |   Terms and Conditions   |   Contact